Marking

Not “good effort”. The marks you lost, and why.

Write the answer, submit it, and get it back assessed against your own syllabus's criteria: the grade, the reason for it, and the specific change that moves you up.

Start free, no card See plans

On Max, at 75 marked submissions a month. Free and Plus do not include marking.

How it works

Write it properly
A real answer under real conditions. Type it, paste it, or photograph handwritten working so the working itself gets assessed.
Edapt marks it
Against the criteria of your syllabus, not a generic rubric. Where a published study design exists for your subject, the marking is grounded in that document.
Fix the specific thing
You get your grade on your own scale, the criteria you met and missed, and the change that takes you up a level. Then you rewrite and resubmit.

What makes it different

Most feedback fails for the same reason: it describes the work instead of diagnosing it. Being told an essay is well structured but needs more analysis tells you nothing you can act on tonight. Edapt names the paragraph, names the claim that went unsupported, and names the evidence that would have supported it.

The grade comes back on your own system's scale, because a mark only means something in the system it was given in. A grade out of 7 and a study score and a 9 to 1 grade are not interchangeable, and a tool that flattens them into a percentage is telling you something that will not match your report.

For several subjects, the marking is grounded in the real published study design rather than a rubric the model invented. Those documents are stored and versioned, so the assessment reflects a specific edition we can point at. That is the difference between marking and a confident guess about marking.

The point is the loop, not the score. Submit, see exactly what cost you marks, rewrite that part, submit again. What moves a grade is doing that four times, which is the thing a human marker cannot give you at eleven at night the week before an exam.

Common questions

How is this different from asking a chatbot to mark my essay?

A chatbot marks against its general sense of what good writing looks like. Edapt marks against the criteria of your actual syllabus. For several subjects that means the real published study design, stored and versioned so we know exactly which edition the marking reflects, rather than a plausible-sounding rubric invented on the spot.

Which subjects have the deepest marking?

Marking works across subjects, and it is grounded in seeded, versioned study designs for VCE English, VCE Chemistry, VCE Psychology, VCE Mathematical Methods, HSC English and HSC Chemistry, built from the VCAA and NESA source documents. More are being added.

Will it just tell me it is good?

No. The output leads with what you lost and where. If your argument is unsupported in the third paragraph, it says which claim and what evidence it needed. Praise without a diagnosis does not move a mark.

Can I submit a photo of handwritten work?

Yes. Photograph the page and Edapt reads it. That matters for maths and science working, where retyping the answer loses the thing being assessed.

Which plan is marking on?

Max only, at 75 marked submissions a month. It is the one feature that is genuinely gated to the top plan, because assessing a long written answer properly costs real money every time it runs.

Explore the rest of the loop

How it works

Write it properly

A real answer under real conditions. Type it, paste it, or photograph handwritten working so the working itself gets assessed.

Edapt marks it

Against the criteria of your syllabus, not a generic rubric. Where a published study design exists for your subject, the marking is grounded in that document.

Fix the specific thing

You get your grade on your own scale, the criteria you met and missed, and the change that takes you up a level. Then you rewrite and resubmit.